From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bogartz v. Astor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1944
268 App. Div. 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

June 26, 1944.


Appeal by Arcy Doll Toy Manufacturing Company from an order declaring null, void and of no effect a notice of lien filed by it. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The award against an employer pursuant to section 14-a Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law is in the nature of a penalty for the illegal employment of minors, for which the employer alone is liable, and from which he may not be relieved by insurance. To permit him to have a lien against the proceeds of the employee's third party action would render nugatory the legislative intent as disclosed by that section.


The statute (§ 29) says "shall have a lien on the proceeds of any recovery * * * to the extent of the total amount of compensation awarded under or provided or estimated" etc. (Italics supplied.) This language should be construed exactly as it reads. [ 182 Misc. 214.]


Summaries of

Bogartz v. Astor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 1944
268 App. Div. 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Bogartz v. Astor

Case Details

Full title:AARON BOGARTZ, an Infant, by JACOB BOGARTZ, His Guardian ad Litem, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)