Boffelli v. Kent Sec. Servs.

Full title: Enzio C. BOFFELLI, Petitioner, v. KENT SECURITY SERVICES, Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Sep 15, 2015

175 So. 3d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 3D14–2897.

2015-09-15

Enzio C. BOFFELLI, Petitioner, v. KENT SECURITY SERVICES, Respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County. Stanford Blake, Lisa S. Walsh and Marcia B. Caballero, Judges. Enzio C. Boffelli, in proper person. Cole, Scott & Kissane and Kathryn L. Smith, for respondent.

WELLS

On Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County. Stanford Blake, Lisa S. Walsh and Marcia B. Caballero, Judges.
Enzio C. Boffelli, in proper person. Cole, Scott & Kissane and Kathryn L. Smith, for respondent.
Before WELLS, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.

We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, seeFla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(2)(B), and deny the petition because there is no departure from the essential requirements of the law. See Soro Co. Intern., Inc. v. Jones 89 So.3d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Nicaragua Trader Corp. v. Alejo Fla. Props., LLC, 19 So.3d 395, 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“On second-tier certiorari review, this Court must determinewhether the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity, afforded procedural due process and followed the essential requirements of law.”).

Certiorari denied.