From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boehringer v. Schmid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

March, 1930.

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [ 133 Misc. 236.]


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question before this court has been determined in favor of the respondents by the opinions of Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J. (in the latter of which Hiscock and Cardozo, JJ., concur), in Matter of Klatzl ( 216 N.Y. 83), and by the refusal of the Court of Appeals on February 26, 1924, to allow an appeal to that court in Coleman v. Coleman ( 207 App. Div. 876). All concur.


Summaries of

Boehringer v. Schmid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Boehringer v. Schmid

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET BOEHRINGER and Others, Appellants, v. EDWIN SCHMID and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)