From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boder v. DaimlerCHRYSLER Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 27, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-557 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-557.

March 27, 2006


ORDER


On March 21, 2006, the Magistrate Judge reported that this matter has been settled (Doc. 32).

The Court denies defendant's motion to dismiss and to strike (Doc. 6) without prejudice to refiling in the event a the parties do not achieve a final settlement.

The Clerk shall remove Doc. 6 from the Court's pending CJRA motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Boder v. DaimlerCHRYSLER Corporation

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 27, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-557 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Boder v. DaimlerCHRYSLER Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Boder, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-557 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 27, 2006)