From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 19, 2001
332 Or. 39 (Or. 2001)

Opinion

(CC A9210-07050; CA A86556; S.C. S46461)

Filed: April 19, 2001

On petition for review filed May 18, 1999.

Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, William C. Snouffer, Judge. 158 Or. App. 521, 974 P.2d 758 (1999).

William F. Gary, Stanton F. Long, Sharon A. Rudnick, James E. Mountain, Jr., and Judith Giers, of Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C, Eugene, filed the petition for petitioners on review.

Margaret A. Sundberg and Mary H. Spillane, of Williams, Kastner Gobbs PLLC, Seattle, Washington, filed the response for respondent on review. With them on the response were Daniel M. Holland and Ronald B. Terzenbach, of Loomis Holland, Eugene.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Kulongoski, Leeson, and De Muniz, Justices.

Riggs, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc., 331 Or. 537, 17 P.3d 473 (2001).


Summaries of

Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 19, 2001
332 Or. 39 (Or. 2001)
Case details for

Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals

Case Details

Full title:PAUL R. BOCCI, JR., guardian ad litem for PAUL R. BOCCI, III, an…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 19, 2001

Citations

332 Or. 39 (Or. 2001)
22 P.3d 758

Citing Cases

Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.

That was sufficient to establish the adversity required for justiciability. Attempting to avoid that…

Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Filed: November 14, 2001 On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 332 Or.…