From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bobo v. McCrosky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Case Number: 1:12cv842 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:12cv842

01-15-2013

Karlos Bobo, Plaintiff(s), v. D. McCrosky, et al., Defendant(s).


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on December 18, 2012 (Doc. 6), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 4, 2013, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Even though plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation, Mr. Bobo did file a letter to the Clerk of Courts regarding his monies in the institution (Doc. 7).

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) is DENIED (Doc. 5).

Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time of thirty (30) days from the date of this order to pay the required filing fee of $350.00. Plaintiff's complaint is not deemed filed until the appropriate fee is paid. See Truitt v. County of Wayne, 148 F.3d 644, 648 (6th Cir. 1998). If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within this time limit, this matter will be CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court


Summaries of

Bobo v. McCrosky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
Case Number: 1:12cv842 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Bobo v. McCrosky

Case Details

Full title:Karlos Bobo, Plaintiff(s), v. D. McCrosky, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

Case Number: 1:12cv842 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)