From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bobko v. Rohrberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1981
85 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

December 28, 1981

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sharpe, J.), dated May 7, 1981, which, inter alia, adjudged defendants Rohrberg and Bobko and the North Shore Yacht Club to be in contempt of court, and imposed fines.


Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and contempt petition dismissed. The fines, if paid, are ordered remitted. The order to show cause by which this contempt application was made did not contain the notice and warning required by section 756 Jud. of the Judiciary Law (see, also, Judiciary Law, § 757). Accordingly, the court lacked the requisite jurisdiction to hold appellants in contempt (see Matter of Rappaport, 85 A.D.2d 697; see, also, Matter of Ellis v Ellis, 85 A.D.2d 602; Barreca v Barreca, 77 A.D.2d 793). Lazer, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bobko v. Rohrberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1981
85 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Bobko v. Rohrberg

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. BOBKO, Respondent, v. C. ROBERT ROHRBERG, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1981

Citations

85 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Trust Co v. Taylor-Cishahayo

The wording of the statute clearly evidences the legislative intent that both the notice and warning appear…

Bigman v. Dime Savings Bank of New York

We note that none of the subpoenas contained or was accompanied by a notice stating the "circumstances or…