From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bobbert v. McKay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 21, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-105E (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-105E

03-21-2016

WILLIAM L. BOBBERT, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY MCKAY, et al., Defendants.

cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): William L. Bobbert LU7095 55 West Bottle Hill Road Grove City, PA 16127 cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On February 23, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 45) recommending that the Court grant the Motions to Dismiss filed by First National Bank (Doc. 31) and Kevin Noel, on behalf of Disabled American Veterans (Doc. 35). Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

The Motions to Dismiss filed by First National Bank (Doc. 31) and Kevin Noel, on behalf of Disabled American Veterans (Doc. 35) are GRANTED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45) hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court, as supplemented herein.

Although the Report and Recommendation does not appear to suggest that Plaintiff's pleading-deficiencies are curable, Judge Lenihan acknowledged the Court's obligation, under appropriate circumstances, to allow an opportunity for amendment. See id. at 6 (recommending that, "to the extent Plaintiff determines that he can remedy [his pleading] deficiencies," the Court should set deadline for amendment). Plaintiff has not responded, by way of objection to the Report and Recommendation or by motion for leave to amend. Plaintiff's silence, coupled with the fact that he already once has amended his pleadings in response to these same Defendants' arguments for dismissal (see Docs. 20, 26 & 29), lead the Court to conclude that the instant dismissal shall be with prejudice. See

IT IS SO ORDERED. March 21, 2016

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): William L. Bobbert
LU7095
55 West Bottle Hill Road
Grove City, PA 16127 cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record

Taylor v. Pilewski, 2008 WL 4861446, *3 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2008) ("[the c]ourt need not provide endless opportunities" for amendment, especially where such opportunity already has been enjoyed).


Summaries of

Bobbert v. McKay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 21, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-105E (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Bobbert v. McKay

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM L. BOBBERT, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY MCKAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 21, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-105E (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2016)

Citing Cases

Sneed v. Patenaude & Felix APC

Sneed's failure to oppose the instant motion, “coupled with the fact that [s]he already once has amended…