From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boards Trs. of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. SJD Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-2401 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-cv-2401

09-16-2015

BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF OHIO LABORERS' FRINGE BENEFIT PROGRAMS, Plaintiff, v. SJD CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's motion to strike answer and to continue preliminary pretrial conference. (ECF No. 9.) The Court GRANTS the motion.

It is well-settled that non-attorneys are not permitted to appear or maintain litigation on behalf of a corporation. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit 11 Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993) ("It has been the law for the better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in federal courts only through licensed counsel."); Doherty v. American Motors Corp., 728 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir. 1984) ("[A] corporation cannot appear in federal court except through an attorney.").

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires signature by an attorney or, if the party is not represented by an attorney, Rule 11(a) requires signature by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Because a corporation cannot appear in court except through an attorney, "[a] pleading by a corporation that is not signed by an attorney is treated as unsigned for Rule 11(a) purposes." White v. Smith, No. 2:09-cv-00574, 2010 WL 795967, at *1 (S.D. Ohio March 2, 2010) (citations omitted). "The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney's or party's attention." Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a).

Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to retain a trial attorney as provided in Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 83.4 WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. Failure to comply with this Order will result in Defendant's Answer being stricken pursuant to Rule 11(a), rendering Defendant in default.

The Court VACATES the preliminary pretrial conference scheduled for November 10, 2015. (ECF No. 8.) The Court will set a new date for the preliminary pretrial conference at a later time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Gregory L. Frost

GREGORY L. FROST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Boards Trs. of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. SJD Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-2401 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Boards Trs. of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. SJD Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF OHIO LABORERS' FRINGE BENEFIT PROGRAMS, Plaintiff…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 16, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:15-cv-2401 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 16, 2015)