From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 15, 2003
835 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-1507.

Opinion filed January 15, 2003.

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Amy N. Dean, Judge. Lower Tribunal Case No. 99-27105.

Isicoff, Ragatz Koenigsberg and Eric D. Isicoff and Louis Perfetti Durante, for appellant.

Moore Goodman and Bruce A. Goodman (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.


After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant's amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1984).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 15, 2003
835 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

BMAB East Tower, Inc. v. Testwell Craig Laboratories & Consultants, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BMAB EAST TOWER, INC., Appellant, v. TESTWELL CRAIG LABORATORIES AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 15, 2003

Citations

835 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC

Although cited by two of the other Districts, no Florida court has expressly adopted the reasoning in Gatins…