Submitted March 13, 1907
Decided April 16, 1907
Henry J. Hemmens and J. Haviland Tompkins for appellant.
Frank M. Hardenbrook for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Dissenting: GRAY, J.
Full title:SARAH A. BLY, Respondent, v . THE EDISON ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY OF…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 16, 1907
And in certain cases this has been defined to mean the value of the use of the premises to the occupant, as…
Cassel v. City of New YorkI am of opinion that the trial court rightly held that the action is not for damages to personal property,…