From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 24, 2013
3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC)

01-24-2013

ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Defendants' motion to strike (#87) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's judicial notice re intimidation of plaintiff party by defendant party in the course of proceedings; and defendant party interference with plaintiff party access to the court (#85) is improper and immaterial and is hereby STRICKEN.

Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file reply to defendants' opposition to motion to compel (#94) is DENIED. Defendants' opposition to motion to compel was filed on December 31, 2013. A reply was due on Thursday, January 10, 2013. The court issued a minute order denying plaintiff's motion to compel on January 15, 2013 (#93). Plaintiff's motion for extension of time was untimely as it was filed two days after the court issued its order and seven days after a reply was due to be filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: _________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 24, 2013
3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Blue v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)