From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 14, 2013
3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC)

02-14-2013

ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Defendants filed a motion for leave to file Exhibit B in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment under seal (#88). No opposition was filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for leave to file Exhibit B in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment under seal (#88) is GRANTED. The exhibit (#90) is filed and shall remain under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Blue v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 14, 2013
3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Blue v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BLUE, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-0010-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2013)