From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blow v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 26, 2009
325 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-8358.

May 14, 2009.

May 26, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00426-RGD-TEM).

Antonio Charles Blow, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Antonio Charles Blow, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blow v. Stansberry, No. 2:08-cv-00426-RGD-TEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Blow v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 26, 2009
325 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Blow v. Stansberry

Case Details

Full title:Antonio Charles BLOW, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden STANSBERRY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

325 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Williams

A petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that the § 2255 remedy is inadequate or ineffective, and the…

Burke v. Williams

A petitioner "bears the burden of showing the inadequacy or ineffectiveness of a § 2255 Petition," and the…