From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blount v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. 12-cv-2941 LKK CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-cv-2941 LKK CKD P

01-24-2013

REGINALD BLOUNT, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's January 2, 2013 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

___________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Blount v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2013
No. 12-cv-2941 LKK CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Blount v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD BLOUNT, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

No. 12-cv-2941 LKK CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2013)