From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloomer v. Offerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

March, 1936.

Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: At the close of the evidence defendant moved for a nonsuit and plaintiff moved for a direction of a verdict. The court was correct in ruling that there was no substantial dispute in the evidence, and that only questions of law remained. Defendant did not move to go to the jury on any question of fact. The rule that the ticket was "void if sold or transferred" was for the sole benefit of the Buffalo Automotive Trade Association which could and did waive it. The ticket was sold, assigned and delivered to plaintiff before the execution against Mumm, the drawer of the ticket, was placed in the hands of the sheriff to be executed (Civ. Prac. Act, § 689) and such assignment carried with it the right of the plaintiff to have the car as soon as the final drawing of the order for the car, on which defendant afterward levied, was had and Mumm made such drawing as agent for the plaintiff. The title to the car was never in Mumm, the judgment debtor, after the execution was placed in the hands of the defendant. All concur. (The judgment awards possession of an automobile.)


Summaries of

Bloomer v. Offerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Bloomer v. Offerman

Case Details

Full title:FRANK H. BLOOMER, Respondent, v. FRANK J. OFFERMAN, as Sheriff of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Ryan v. O'Leary

After the assignments were made, the assignor had no title to the refund money to which liens of…

Rockmore v. Lehman

See Restatement, Contracts, §§ 150, 154, 155, 161. The validity of an assignment of the former kind seems to…