From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloodworth v. BHT Inv. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2011
CASE NO. 4:11CV00142 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:11CV00142 BSM

12-21-2011

JONNA BLOODWORTH PLAINTIFF v. BHT INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. DEFENDANT


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties have settled all claims and move for an order of dismissal pending final payment. [Doc. No. 9]. The motion is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

The undersigned retains complete jurisdiction for thirty days to vacate this order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. If the parties desire that any settlement agreement be made a part of the record herein, they are directed to reduce it to writing and file those documents within sixty days of the date of this order.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bloodworth v. BHT Inv. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2011
CASE NO. 4:11CV00142 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Bloodworth v. BHT Inv. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JONNA BLOODWORTH PLAINTIFF v. BHT INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC. DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 4:11CV00142 BSM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2011)