From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloodwell v. Bloodwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 18, 1987
508 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-918.

June 18, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Frank N. Kaney, Judge.

John S. Plummer of Gurney Handley, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

John M. Cain of Cain Ewald, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.


Robert D. Bloodwell appeals from a final judgment of dissolution which awarded his former wife $60,000 per year in alimony, in excess of $500,000 in assets, and a $25,000 contribution toward her attorney fee. Given the respective financial positions of the parties, we find no abuse of the trial court's discretion with the exception of the attorney fee award. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). The parties herein are equally able to pay their attorneys. See Mauldin v. Mauldin, 493 So.2d 1103 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Sizemore v. Sizemore, 487 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Ariko v. Ariko, 475 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Zulywitz v. Zulywitz, 473 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

We reverse the attorney fee award but otherwise affirm the final judgment.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.


Summaries of

Bloodwell v. Bloodwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 18, 1987
508 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Bloodwell v. Bloodwell

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT D. BLOODWELL, APPELLANT, v. NANCY C. BLOODWELL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 18, 1987

Citations

508 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Wismar v. Wismar

Since the wife had a substantially equal ability to pay attorney fees, we also reverse the trial court's…

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson

Accordingly, we reverse the award of attorney's fees. See Bloodwell v. Bloodwell, 508 So.2d 771 (Fla. 5th DCA…