From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Res.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 8, 2024
21-cv-08787-AMO (TSH) (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-08787-AMO (TSH)

05-08-2024

BLOCKCHAIN INNOVATION, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL

RE: DKT. NO. 198

THOMAS S. HIXSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In ECF No. 198, Plaintiff filed a motion to consider whether another party's materials should be sealed, specifically, Exhibits C and D to the discovery letter brief, which are excerpts of Roger Bayston's deposition. In ECF No. 204, Defendants state that they do not seek to seal any of the excerpts identified in Plaintiff's motion to seal. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED, and the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file Exhibits C and D in the public record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Res.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 8, 2024
21-cv-08787-AMO (TSH) (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Res.

Case Details

Full title:BLOCKCHAIN INNOVATION, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 8, 2024

Citations

21-cv-08787-AMO (TSH) (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2024)