From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blitz v. Bagatelle Int’l U.S.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 30, 2021
20 Civ. 10344 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 30, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 10344 (PAE)

07-30-2021

DAVID B. BLITZ, Petitioner, v. BAGATELLE INTERNATIONAL USA, INC., Respondent.


ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.

On May 13, 2021, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute because petitioner had failed to appear notwithstanding respondent's service of the removal notice. Dkt. 4. The Court's May 13, 2021 order to show cause advised that if petitioner did not appear by May 27, 2021, showing good cause why petitioner had not appeared, the Court would dismiss the case. The Court has not received any written communication from petitioner, and petitioner has not appeared. Accordingly, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the Court's inherent power, see Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-32 (1962), the Court hereby dismisses this case, without prejudice, for petitioner's failure to prosecute.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blitz v. Bagatelle Int’l U.S.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 30, 2021
20 Civ. 10344 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Blitz v. Bagatelle Int’l U.S.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID B. BLITZ, Petitioner, v. BAGATELLE INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 30, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 10344 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 30, 2021)