From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blevins v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 25, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv317 (WOB-SKB) (S.D. Ohio Sep. 25, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv317 (WOB-SKB)

09-25-2015

ALONZO BLEVINS PETITIONER v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 14), and there being no objections filed, and the Court being sufficiently advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 4), is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged in the petition, which have been addressed on the merits herein, because the petitioner has not stated a "viable claim of the denial of a constitutional right," nor are the issued presented "adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would not be taken in "good faith," and, petitioner therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

This 25th day of September, 2015.

Signed By:

William O . Bertelsman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Blevins v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 25, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv317 (WOB-SKB) (S.D. Ohio Sep. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Blevins v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO BLEVINS PETITIONER v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv317 (WOB-SKB) (S.D. Ohio Sep. 25, 2015)