From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1977
59 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

November 28, 1977


In an action to recover damages on the theory that defendants enabled trustees to waste the assets of a trust, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 8, 1977, which denied plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 3133 to strike certain interrogatories. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and interrogatories stricken, without prejudice to the propounding of proper interrogatories by defendant. The interrogatories, consisting of 49 pages, are unduly prolix, vexatious and unreasonably oppressive. Rather than burden this court by making a piecemeal determination of which interrogatories are material and necessary pursuant to CPLR 3101, the proper remedy is a vacatur of the entire demand (see Heimowitz v Handler, Kleiman, Sukenik Segal, P.C., 51 A.D.2d 702). Although, in order to reduce delay, we encourage a liberal disclosure of facts bearing on the controversy which will assist a litigant in the preparation for trial, the interrogatories posed by the defendant did not satisfy or meet such needs (see Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403). Hopkins, J.P., Latham, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1977
59 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Blasi v. Marine Midland Bank

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE BLASI et al., Appellants, v. MARINE MIDLAND BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1977

Citations

59 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Hall v. Craig

In so ruling, Special Term erred. Since this was not a negligence case, defendant was entitled to utilize the…

Faith v. Boston Old Colony Insurance Company

Interrogatory No. 16 requires that revelation of these identities include the number and subdivision of each…