From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blankstyn v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 18, 1996
79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996)

Opinion


79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996) William C. BLANKSTYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit March 18, 1996

Submitted March 12, 1996.

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

77 A.F.T.R.2d 96-1588

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-91-00452-CAM, C.A. Muecke, District Judge, Presiding.

D. Ariz., 1994 WL 389471.

DISMISSED.

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.

William C. Blankstyn appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the United States, following a limited remand from this court, in his action to quiet title under 28 U.S.C. § 2410 and for wrongful disclosure of tax return information under 26 U.S.C. § 7431. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In light of Blankstyn's failure to pay monetary sanctions previously imposed by this court for filing a frivolous appeal, we grant the government's motion to dismiss. See Hymes v. United States, 993 F.2d 701, 702 (9th Cir.1993).

DISMISSED.

Blankstyn's motion to file an opposition to the government's motion to dismiss is granted. Blankstyn's opposition is ordered filed.

See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4.


Summaries of

Blankstyn v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 18, 1996
79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Blankstyn v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:William C. BLANKSTYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 1996

Citations

79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Fleetwood Enters., Inc.)

“ ‘We owe substantial deference to the bankruptcy court's interpretation of its own orders and will not…

Marciano v. Fahs (In re Marciano)

"We owe substantial deference to the bankruptcy court's interpretation of its own orders and will not…