From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 27, 1995
662 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-02944.

October 27, 1995.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; William J. Nelson, Judge.


Mitchell Blanks appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. The trial court's order offers no basis for the denial but merely attaches a copy of the state's response to the motion. While the state's response had specific citations to the appellate record to support its conclusion that the issues raised are without merit, those referenced record excerpts are not attached to the order.

Accordingly, the order denying the motion must be reversed. On remand, if the court again concludes that summary denial is proper, it must attach to its order those portions of the case file and record which demonstrate that Blanks is entitled to no relief; otherwise, the court must conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of his claims.

Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blanks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 27, 1995
662 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Blanks v. State

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL BLANKS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 27, 1995

Citations

662 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Blanks v. 20th Judicial Circuit Court

Id. Petitioner filed an appeal, and Florida's Second District Court of Appeal reversed the order and remanded…

Berrios v. State

Further, the attachment to the state's reply, one page of the plea transcript, is insufficient to support the…