From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blankenship v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 15, 1990
556 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 1990)

Opinion

No. 74176.

February 15, 1990.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance, Second District — Case Nos. 88-01349, 88-01353, 88-01354, 88-01356, 88-01357, 88-01359, 88-01419, 88-01421, 88-01430, 88-01431, 88-01432, 88-01433, 88-01553, 88-01554, 88-01555, 88-01557, 88-01559, 88-01560, 88-01602, 88-01694, 88-01715, 88-01716, 88-01799 and 88-01801.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Lawrence D. Shearer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioners.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.


We have for review Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:

DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990). We approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Blankenship v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 15, 1990
556 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 1990)
Case details for

Blankenship v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUTH ANN BLANKENSHIP, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 15, 1990

Citations

556 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 1990)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

The subject matter of an act may be as broad as the legislature chooses, so long as the matters included have…

Bailey v. State

Affirmed. See § 893.13(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); State v. Dickey, 928 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 2006);Blankenship v.…