From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blankenship v. Parris

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 30, 2022
3:22-cv-214 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 30, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-214

06-30-2022

ROBERT J. BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff, v. MIKE PARRIS and WAYNE BUNCH, Defendants.


Debra C. Poplin Magistrate Judge

JUDGMENT ORDER

TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order filed herewith, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner's pro se civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum and Order that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blankenship v. Parris

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Jun 30, 2022
3:22-cv-214 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Blankenship v. Parris

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff, v. MIKE PARRIS and WAYNE BUNCH…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Jun 30, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-214 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 30, 2022)