From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blank v. Schafrann

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 15, 1987
70 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. 1987)

Opinion

Argued November 18, 1987

Decided December 15, 1987

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Lawrence E. Kahn, J.

Stephen L. Oppenheim for appellant.

Barry Golomb, respondent pro se, and for Robert Blank, respondent.

Michael M. Platzman, respondent pro se, and for Martin Rosenblum and others, respondents.

Jay H. Schafrann, respondent pro se.


Order reversed, with costs, and the motion to dismiss the complaint as against defendants Schafrann, Platzman, Rosenblum, McBride and Golomb denied for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division ( 129 A.D.2d 830, 831-833).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Blank v. Schafrann

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 15, 1987
70 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. 1987)
Case details for

Blank v. Schafrann

Case Details

Full title:LEO BLANK, Individually and as a Shareholder of PREMIUM GAS SERVICE, INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 1987

Citations

70 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. 1987)
524 N.Y.S.2d 377
519 N.E.2d 288

Citing Cases

Beacher v. Estate of Beacher

Brenda also seeks leave to add the law firm of H&K as a party, arguing that any party who knowingly receives…

Steinberg v. W.J. Nolan Co., Inc.

Assuming the truth of plaintiffs' allegations, the moving defendants are the recipients of the corporate…