From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaney v. TDCJ

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
May 23, 2022
Civil Action 3:22-CV-938-C-BH (N.D. Tex. May. 23, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:22-CV-938-C-BH

05-23-2022

JERRY BLANEY, Plaintiff, v. TDCJ, WARDEN BOWERS, Defendants.


ORDER

SAM R. CUMMINGS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed without prejudice for improper venue.

The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Plaintiffs objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice for improper venue.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Blaney v. TDCJ

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
May 23, 2022
Civil Action 3:22-CV-938-C-BH (N.D. Tex. May. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Blaney v. TDCJ

Case Details

Full title:JERRY BLANEY, Plaintiff, v. TDCJ, WARDEN BOWERS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: May 23, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:22-CV-938-C-BH (N.D. Tex. May. 23, 2022)