From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blaney v. Ovard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 13, 2014
No. 3:14-cv-2219-K-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:14-cv-2219-K-BN

08-13-2014

JERRY BLANEY, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE OVARD, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to reopen the case if he pays the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee within sixty (60) days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to pay the filing fee is denied as moot.

To the extent, if any, that Plaintiff presents claims cognizable in a petition for writ of habeas corpus, such claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Signed August 13th, 2014.

/s/_________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blaney v. Ovard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 13, 2014
No. 3:14-cv-2219-K-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Blaney v. Ovard

Case Details

Full title:JERRY BLANEY, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE OVARD, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2014

Citations

No. 3:14-cv-2219-K-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2014)

Citing Cases

Blaney v. Ovard

Blaney is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis as to civil rights complaints. See, e.g., Blaney v. Ovard,…