From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BLANDING v. FKI LOGISTEX, INC.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Feb 11, 2011
C.A. NO.: 3:09-cv-758-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2011)

Opinion

C.A. NO.: 3:09-cv-758-JFA.

February 11, 2011

William M. O'Neil, Esquire, Hood Law Firm, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, ATTORNEYS FOR FKI LOGISTEX, INC.

Morgan S. Templeton (#7187), Elmore Wall, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, ATTORNEYS FOR STEEL METALWORKS, LTD.


ORDER


The Third Party Defendant, Ripley Metalworks, Ltd., moved to dismiss the first and second causes of action presented in the Third Party Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), arguing that FKI Logistex, Inc.'s claims were really claims of equitable indemnity. South Carolina National Bank v. Stone, 749 F. Supp. 1419, 1433 (D.S.C. 1990) (J. Anderson) ("a rose by any other name is still a rose and that regardless of the title given to the claims" the claims asserted remained claims of indemnity and contribution). The matter was scheduled to be heard by the Court on February 14, 2011.

FKI initially opposed this motion but has since consented. The Court has considered the Motion and hereby GRANTS the motion. Accordingly, the first and second causes of action presented against Ripley are hereby dismissed and ended with prejudice. FKI's third cause of action for equitable indemnity remains.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 11, 2011

Columbia, South Carolina


Summaries of

BLANDING v. FKI LOGISTEX, INC.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Feb 11, 2011
C.A. NO.: 3:09-cv-758-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2011)
Case details for

BLANDING v. FKI LOGISTEX, INC.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN BLANDING, Plaintiff, v. FKI LOGISTEX, INC. and W H SYSTEMS, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2011

Citations

C.A. NO.: 3:09-cv-758-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2011)