From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bland v. Pierson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 12, 2023
2:20-CV-1165-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-CV-1165-DAD-DMC-P

06-12-2023

JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Plaintiff, v. PIERSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Defendants' motions, ECF Nos. 36, 80, and 82, to strike various filings as unauthorized sur-replies to Defendants' motions to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and for summary judgment. Given Plaintiff's pro se status, and in the interest of justice, the Court is willing to consider Plaintiff's filings. Defendants' underlying motions will be addressed by separate findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motions to strike, ECF Nos. 36, 80, and 82, are denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. 36, 80 and 82 as pending motions.


Summaries of

Bland v. Pierson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 12, 2023
2:20-CV-1165-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Bland v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Plaintiff, v. PIERSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 12, 2023

Citations

2:20-CV-1165-DAD-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)