From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bland v. Hebner

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 4, 2024
3:23-cv-00448-JR (D. Or. May. 4, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00448-JR

05-04-2024

BELLA BLAND, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY HEBNER, an individual, and DG LLC db Dream Girls Espresso, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Defendants.


ORDER

HERNANDEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on March 22, 2024, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. F&R, ECF 24. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [23] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bland v. Hebner

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 4, 2024
3:23-cv-00448-JR (D. Or. May. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Bland v. Hebner

Case Details

Full title:BELLA BLAND, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY HEBNER, an individual, and DG LLC db…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: May 4, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-00448-JR (D. Or. May. 4, 2024)