From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blanche v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
CV 14-9145-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion

          Michael Wayne Blanche, Petitioner, Pro se, Adelanto, CA.

          For United States of America, Respondent: Sheila Nagaraj, LEAD ATTORNEY, Office of U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA; Assistant U.S. Attorney LA-CV, Office of U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN A. KRONSTADT, United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action without prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Blanche v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
CV 14-9145-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Blanche v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WAYNE BLANCHE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

Citations

CV 14-9145-JAK (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)