Blakely v. State

Full title: Richard Blakely, Petitioner, v. State of Ohio, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jun 12, 2009

Case No. 1:09cv191 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09cv191.

June 12, 2009

ORDER

MICHAEL BARRETT, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on May 15, 2009 (Doc. 4).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. This matter is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit