From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 26, 2016
No. 05-15-00657-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 26, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-15-00657-CR No. 05-15-00658-CR No. 05-15-00659-CR

02-26-2016

JENNIFER LOU BLAKE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-42292-I, F11-42291-I, F11-72467-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Francis

Jennifer Lou Blake appeals her convictions for fraudulent use or possession of identifying information in an amount less than five items, making a false statement to obtain property or credit, and evading arrest or detention while using a motor vehicle. After the revocation of her community supervision, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for two years in state jail on the fraudulent use or possession of identifying information and making false statement to obtain property or credit offenses and two years in prison on the evading arrest or detention offense.

Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court's judgments.

/Molly Francis/

MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
150657F.U05

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F11-42292-I).
Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Lang-Miers and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered February 26, 2016.

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F11-42291-I).
Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Lang-Miers and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered February 26, 2016.

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F11-72467-I).
Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Lang-Miers and Myers participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered February 26, 2016.


Summaries of

Blake v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 26, 2016
No. 05-15-00657-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Blake v. State

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER LOU BLAKE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Feb 26, 2016

Citations

No. 05-15-00657-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 26, 2016)