From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blake v. Holly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
Feb 22, 2012
Civil No. 09-5264 (W.D. Ark. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-5264

02-22-2012

GEOFFREY NEAL BLAKE PLAINTIFF v. CAPTAIN HOLLY and SHERIFF FERGUSON DEFENDANTS


ORDER

NOW on this 22nd day of February 2012, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 64), filed on January 31, 2012, to which no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds in sound in all respects and it will, therefore, be adopted it in toto.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 64) is hereby adopted in toto;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Non-Suit (Doc. 62) is hereby granted and this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blake v. Holly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
Feb 22, 2012
Civil No. 09-5264 (W.D. Ark. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Blake v. Holly

Case Details

Full title:GEOFFREY NEAL BLAKE PLAINTIFF v. CAPTAIN HOLLY and SHERIFF FERGUSON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 09-5264 (W.D. Ark. Feb. 22, 2012)