Opinion
Civil No. 10-615-TC
02-12-2012
HENRY EDWARD BLAIR, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent.
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on November 18, 2011, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982) .
Petitioner has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.
I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed November 18, 2011, in its entirety. Petitioner's petition (#1) is denied without prejudice. This proceeding is dismissed. The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE