From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blair v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 27, 1934
153 So. 307 (Fla. 1934)

Opinion

Opinion Filed February 27, 1934.

A case of original jurisdiction. — Habeas corpus.

Parks M. Carmichael, for Petitioner;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Respondent.


This is a companion case to the case of Crosby v. Chapman, decided at the present term.

The petitioner by writ of habeas corpus in this case attacks the information under which the petitioner was convicted and sentenced upon the same grounds as the information in the case of Crosby v. Chapman, decided at the present term, was assailed, and upon the authority of that case, this writ of habeas corpus must be dismissed and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the respondent.

It is so ordered.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL and BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Blair v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 27, 1934
153 So. 307 (Fla. 1934)
Case details for

Blair v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:E. E. BLAIR v. L. F. CHAPMAN, as Superintendent, State Prison

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Feb 27, 1934

Citations

153 So. 307 (Fla. 1934)
153 So. 307