From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blair v. Brands

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 28, 2017
Civil No. 1:15cv400-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:15cv400-HSO-RHW

04-28-2017

ALLEN R. BLAIR PLAINTIFF v. YUM BRANDS and TACO BELL DEFENDANTS


FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter came on to be heard upon the Motion [62] for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Yum Brands and Taco Bell. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the pleadings on file, the record as a whole, and relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with its Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 28th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blair v. Brands

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 28, 2017
Civil No. 1:15cv400-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Blair v. Brands

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN R. BLAIR PLAINTIFF v. YUM BRANDS and TACO BELL DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 28, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 1:15cv400-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 2017)