From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackman v. Stainer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2958 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-2958 KJM KJN P

05-07-2015

TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. STAINER, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 26, 2015, the court denied plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 10). Thirty days passed and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or otherwise respond to the March 26, 2015 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 7, 2015

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Black2958.fr


Summaries of

Blackman v. Stainer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-2958 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Blackman v. Stainer

Case Details

Full title:TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. STAINER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 7, 2015

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-2958 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2015)