Opinion
21-1410 21-1580 21-1584
03-22-2022
SARAH BLACKBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, d/b/a Erie Insurance Group, Defendant-Appellee. GREG M. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, d/b/a Erie Insurance Group, Defendant-Appellee. BRIAN MOORE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alexandria Moore, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, d/b/a Erie Insurance Group, Defendant-Appellee.
Brent K. Kesner, Ernest G. Hentschel, II, KESNER & KESNER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellants. Matthew J. Perry, J. Jarrod Jordan, Jill E. Lansden, LAMP BARTRAM LEVY TRAUTWEIN PERRY & POWELL, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 25, 2022
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. (2:18-cv-00980; 2:18-cv-001136; 2:18-cv-01090)
ON BRIEF:
Brent K. Kesner, Ernest G. Hentschel, II, KESNER & KESNER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellants.
Matthew J. Perry, J. Jarrod Jordan, Jill E. Lansden, LAMP BARTRAM LEVY TRAUTWEIN PERRY & POWELL, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished opinion. Judge Motz wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wynn and Judge Thacker joined.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases appeal the district court's denial of their motions to amend their complaints and the dismissal of their actions. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the district court's reasoning, and we detect no error. See J.A. 657-672. Therefore, we affirm on the basis of the reasons given in the district court's opinion. See also Lydick v. Erie Ins. Prop. & Cas. Co., 778 Fed.Appx. 271 (4th Cir. 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED