From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 1993
614 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-03791.

March 24, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Susan Sexton, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant, Clifford Black, contends that the trial court improperly ordered him to "maintain an hourly accounting of all your activities on a daily log which you will submit to your Community Control officer upon request" as a condition of his community control. Black argues that since that condition was not pronounced at sentencing, nor is it authorized by statute, it should be stricken pursuant to Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The state concedes on this point, and we agree.

Therefore, based on the authority of Vinyard, the above-referenced condition of Black's community control is hereby stricken. Since we find no merit in the other issue Black raises on this appeal, the judgment of the trial court is otherwise affirmed.

PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Black v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 1993
614 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Black v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFORD BLACK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 24, 1993

Citations

614 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Palag v. State

Therefore, this condition must be stricken. Black v. State, 614 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Vinyard v.…