From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Budget Rent a Car Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1996
224 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 27, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff Public Administrator, who was appointed administrator of the decedents' estates because no member of either of their families was qualified to so serve, is a "nominal party", who neither knew the decedents nor had any connection with their families or the other parties to the action before his appointment. In these circumstances, his deposition cannot possibly lead to disclosure of any material and necessary facts ( see, Allen v Cromwell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 406-407). There is no merit to defendants' argument that the Public Administrator's status as a party is sufficient to entitle them to his deposition.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Black v. Budget Rent a Car Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1996
224 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Black v. Budget Rent a Car Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT S. BLACK, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. BUDGET RENT A CAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. RLC Med., P.C.

" It is incumbent on the party seeking disclosure to demonstrate that the method of discovery sought will…