From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black Diamond Ins. Co. v. Mun. Court of Las Vegas

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 11, 2016
No. 70065 (Nev. May. 11, 2016)

Opinion

No. 70065

05-11-2016

BLACK DIAMOND INSURANCE COMPANY; AND SWIFT BAIL BONDS, INC., Petitioners, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS; AND THE HONORABLE MARTIN D. HASTINGS, Respondents, and CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a municipal court's denial of a motion to exonerate bail bonds.

Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that the municipal court arbitrarily or capriciously exercised its discretion. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). Accordingly, our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted, see NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (holding that this court has the discretion to determine whether to consider a writ petition), and we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Saitta /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Martin D. Hastings, Municipal Court Judge

Morris Law Center

Las Vegas City Attorney

Las Vegas Municipal Court Clerk


Summaries of

Black Diamond Ins. Co. v. Mun. Court of Las Vegas

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 11, 2016
No. 70065 (Nev. May. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Black Diamond Ins. Co. v. Mun. Court of Las Vegas

Case Details

Full title:BLACK DIAMOND INSURANCE COMPANY; AND SWIFT BAIL BONDS, INC., Petitioners…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 11, 2016

Citations

No. 70065 (Nev. May. 11, 2016)