Opinion
11-01-2016
Tami Tal BITON, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Sameh S. SEROUR, et al., Defendants–Appellants.
Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP, New York (Jared Arthur Turco of counsel), for appellants. Halperin & Halperin, P.C., New York (Jeffrey Weiskopf of counsel), for respondents.
Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP, New York (Jared Arthur Turco of counsel), for appellants.
Halperin & Halperin, P.C., New York (Jeffrey Weiskopf of counsel), for respondents.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered March 9, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, restricted infant plaintiff's deposition testimony to the issue of damages, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
The compliance order on appeal is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice, nor did defendants make a motion seeking leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701[a][2] ; Diaz v. New York Mercantile Exch., 1 A.D.3d 242, 243, 768 N.Y.S.2d 5 [1st Dept.2003] ).
TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, WEBBER, JJ., concur.