From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bistricer v. Ehrenreich

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 31, 1977
346 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 77-43.

May 31, 1977.

Appeal from the Dade County Circuit Court, James Earnest, J.

Levey Rubenstein, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

No appearance by counsel for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and HUBBART, JJ.


The defendants, Herman Bistricer and Betty Bistricer, appeal an order denying their motion to dismiss for failure to acquire personal jurisdiction over them pursuant to Sections 48.161 and 48.181, Florida Statutes (1975). It affirmatively appears from the complaint filed that the plaintiffs do not allege that these defendants are non-residents of the State of Florida or, in the alternative, that they are concealing themselves.

The appellees have failed to file a brief in support of the order that they received from the trial court.

The motion should have been granted pursuant to the rule set forth in Red Top Cab Baggage Co. v. Holt, 154 Fla. 77, 16 So.2d 649 (1944). See also Chase Manhattan Bank v. Banco Del Atlantico, 343 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Reversed.


Summaries of

Bistricer v. Ehrenreich

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 31, 1977
346 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Bistricer v. Ehrenreich

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN BISTRICER AND BETTY BISTRICER, APPELLANTS, v. JOSEPH W. EHRENREICH…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 31, 1977

Citations

346 So. 2d 624 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Ferguson v. McWilliams

It is well-settled that "[t]o support substituted service of process on a defendant, the complaint must…

Benitez v. Ins. Co. of North America

The order under review is reversed upon a holding that the trial court did not acquire jurisdiction over the…