From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. First National Bank of Kitzmillersville

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jul 10, 1912
86 A. 1102 (Md. 1912)

Opinion

(No. 3, April Term, 1912.)

Filed July 10th, 1912.

A deposit was made in a savings bank with instructions by the depositor to the cashier to enter in the pass-book furnished by the bank "this account is subject to withdrawal by" E.J.T. (the daughter of the depositor). The depositor also directed the same entry to be made on the bank's ledger and satisfied himself by examination that the entry was so made. Subsequently the depositor withdrew all the funds so deposited, but made a new and larger deposit, subject to the same conditions, which the depositor verified as before. A suit for the deposit was brought against the bank by the administrator of the depositor and resulted in a judgment for the defendant; on appeal this judgment was affirmed by a divided Court.

Filed July 10th, 1912.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Garrett County (HENDERSON, J.).

The cause was submitted on brief April 9th, 1912, to BOYD, C.J., BRISCOE, PEARCE, BURKE, THOMAS, URNER and STOCKBRIDGE, JJ.

Renninger and Offutt filed a brief for the appellant.

Fred A. Thayer and Edward H. Sincell filed a brief for the appellees.


Summaries of

Bishop v. First National Bank of Kitzmillersville

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jul 10, 1912
86 A. 1102 (Md. 1912)
Case details for

Bishop v. First National Bank of Kitzmillersville

Case Details

Full title:B.F. BISHOP, ADMINISTRATOR OF ROBERT W. YOUNG, vs . THE FIRST NATIONAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jul 10, 1912

Citations

86 A. 1102 (Md. 1912)
118 Md. 694

Citing Cases

Soos v. Soos

Beyond that point the petition cannot be amended so as to add any allegations with respect to the cause of…

Mount Builders LLC v. Oddo

The power to change the name of streets is akin to the power vested in the boards of aldermen and common…