From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Bishop

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 23, 1995
667 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

affirming portion of contempt order finding Husband failed to pay children’s health insurance premiums and ordering him to pay their incurred medical expenses

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Johnson

Opinion

No. 94-3444.

August 23, 1995.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. E. Vernon Douglas, Judge.

Robert L. Appleget, Jr. of Appleget, Lizarralde Jerry, Ocala, for appellant.

No appearance, for appellee.


The marriage of W.E. Bishop, Jr. (husband) and Patricia Bishop (wife) was dissolved on June 27, 1991. The final order of dissolution included the husband's agreement to pay certain marital debts. The order also required the husband to maintain health insurance for the benefit of the parties' two minor children.

The order presently here on review, dated September 20, 1994, finds that the husband failed to maintain the children's health insurance, holds him in civil contempt for failure to pay a marital debt, and orders him to pay the children's incurred medical expenses ($5982.80), the marital debt ($4892.28), and the wife's attorney's fee ($500). The husband appeals that aspect of the order holding him in civil contempt.

Although a finding of civil contempt was made, imprisonment was not ordered.

This court has held that "[o]bligations incurred by a party in a marital property settlement are not subject to enforcement through contempt proceedings." Taylor v. Taylor, 653 So.2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); cf. Hobbs v. Hobbs, 518 So.2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (holding that a husband cannot be imprisoned for failure to pay a third party a joint debt incurred by the husband and wife). We note however that the trial judge did not have the benefit of our decision in Taylor at the time he entered the order under review.

We thus reverse that part of the order holding the husband in civil contempt for failure to pay a marital debt, without prejudice to the wife to seek any other lawful means of enforcement in the event the debt is not satisfied as ordered. We affirm in all other respects.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part.

ERVIN, WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Bishop

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 23, 1995
667 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

affirming portion of contempt order finding Husband failed to pay children’s health insurance premiums and ordering him to pay their incurred medical expenses

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Johnson
Case details for

Bishop v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:W.E. BISHOP, JR., APPELLANT, v. PATRICIA BISHOP, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 23, 1995

Citations

667 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Navarro v. Navarro

We conclude that the obligation to split the profits of an ongoing business, even when set forth in a…

Montanez v. Montanez

Our reversal, however, does not mean that the former wife has no other legal remedy of enforcing the former…