From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birtwell v. Hosmer

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Dec 7, 1897
20 R.I. 309 (R.I. 1897)

Opinion

December 7, 1897.

PRESENT: Matteson, C.J., Stiness and Tillinghast, JJ.

The filing of an account with notice of intention to claim a lien is not a commencement of legal process to enforce the lien. The commencement of legal process ought not to be left to implication.

PETITION IN EQUITY to enforce a mechanic's lien.

Frank S. Arnold, for petitioner.

Nathan W. Littlefield, for respondent.


The petitioner has failed to show a compliance with the statute, since the mere filing of an account, with notice of an intention to claim a lien, is not a commencement of legal process to enforce the lien within the meaning of the statute, as construed in Tingley v. White, 17 R.I. 533, and Goff v. Hosmer, 20 R.I. Part 1, 93, which requires a statement that the lodging of the account or demand is for the purpose of commencing legal process to enforce the lien. As suggested by counsel for the respondent, the commencement of legal process ought not to be left to implication.

Gen. Laws R.I. cap. 206, § 7.

The petition must therefore be dismissed.


Summaries of

Birtwell v. Hosmer

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Dec 7, 1897
20 R.I. 309 (R.I. 1897)
Case details for

Birtwell v. Hosmer

Case Details

Full title:ARCHIBALD BIRTWELL vs. FREDERICK H. HOSMER

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: Dec 7, 1897

Citations

20 R.I. 309 (R.I. 1897)
38 A. 946

Citing Cases

Anderson v. Silverman

When an attempt is made to combine the two papers it is necessary clearly to indicate both purposes. If the…