From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bird v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 21, 1931
3 P.2d 694 (Okla. 1931)

Opinion

No. 20514

Opinion Filed July 21, 1931. Rehearing Denied October 13, 1931.

(Syllabus.)

1. Courts — Guardian and Ward — Jurisdiction of County Courts Over Minor Allottees.

The county courts of Oklahoma are courts of record with jurisdiction to appoint guardians over the persons and estates of minor allottees of the Five Civilized Tribes without reference to the degree of Indian blood.

2. Guardian and Ward — Records of County Court as Importing Jurisdiction to Appoint Guardian.

The records of a county court showing the appointment of a guardian for a minor import jurisdiction in the court so to do, and it will be inferred from the fact that such an appointment was made that all facts necessary to vest the court with jurisdiction to make the appointment had been found by the court to exist before the appointment of the guardian.

3. Judgment — Collateral Attack not Authorized Unless Judgment Void on Face of Record.

A judgment of a court of general jurisdiction is not subject to collateral attack unless the judgment is void upon the face of the record.

4. Same — When Judgment Void on Its Face — When Void for Want of Jurisdiction.

A judgment is void on its face when its invalidity is affirmatively disclosed by an inspection of the judgment roll, but it is not void for want of jurisdiction, in the legal sense, unless its invalidity appears upon the face of the record.

5. Judgment — Vacation for Fraud — False Evidence.

False evidence or perjury alone, relative to an issue tried, is not sufficient ground for vacating or setting aside a judgment; the fraud which will authorize the court to vacate a judgment must be extrinsic or collateral to the issues tried in the cause wherein the judgment was rendered; it must be such fraud as to prevent the other from having a trial of the issues.

6. Guardian and Ward — Demurrer to Petition in Action to Set Aside Guardian Sale Held Properly Sustained.

Record examined, and held, that the amended petition of plaintiffs did not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action against the defendants and that there was no error in sustaining a demurrer thereto.

Appeal from District Court, Okfuskee County; Fred A. Speakman, Judge.

Action by Jim Bird and another against S.T. Palmer and others. From adverse judgment, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

W.H. Ballard and T.H. Wren, for plaintiffs in error.

James C. Wright, Victor C. Mieher, R.Y. Stevenson, Massingale, Duff Manatt, and Warren, Crutcher Warren, for defendants in error.


This cause was consolidated with cause No. 19979. The decision in the consolidated cause was this day rendered in cause No. 19979 between the same parties. 151 Okla. 3, 3 P.2d 890. The law announced therein is applied herein.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., absent. RILEY, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Bird v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 21, 1931
3 P.2d 694 (Okla. 1931)
Case details for

Bird v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:BIRD et al. v. PALMER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 21, 1931

Citations

3 P.2d 694 (Okla. 1931)
152 Okla. 7

Citing Cases

Grose v. Romero

The county courts are courts of record. Bird v. Palmer, 152 Okla. 7, 3 P.2d 894. This court has stated that…

Beason v. I. E. Miller Servs., Inc.

A general verdict is that by which they pronounce generally upon all or any of the issues, either in favor of…